日历

2024 - 5
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
«» 2024 - 5 «»

日志分类

存 档

日志文章


2007-10-14

GEPON vs. EPON

GPON is more efficient than an EPON when running GEM mode. GEM is essentially GFP over PON. Its nice and works well for Ethernet transport. GPON in traditional ATM mode is no different that APON/BPON and carries all of the ATM overhead and inefficiencies and is much less efficient than EPON for Ethernet transport. )#aZz*PM  
>A NatI5  
The Ethernet protocol legacy was carried over to EPON for a number of reasons. Probably the most important reason is that it allows vendors to use standard Ethernet pieces when building EPON chips/ONU. This has allowed for relatively inexpensive EPON ONUs. In Japan the EPON ONU price is under $100. RO/p`7dz  
}6?&1c|2~  
As always, Ethernet is less efficient but cheaper than ATM based systems. In addition, GPONs attempt to resolve everyone’s problem has made it overly complicated and, at least initally, more expensive. Pick your poison. qgTh*j`W  



Fiber Optic Networks & Cable TV Networks Equipments Resources: http://www.fiber-optic-networks.com
类别: 无分类 |  评论(0) |  浏览(8093) |  收藏
发表评论
表情 [更多]
看不清楚,换一张